Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Crazy’ plan to merge parts of Perthshire and Fife slammed by public

Merging parts of rural Perthshire with industrial Fife do not make sense, said members of the public.
Merging parts of rural Perthshire with industrial Fife do not make sense, said members of the public.

Plans to merge parts of Perthshire and Fife triggered a backlash from residents.

Officials are redrawing Westminster constituencies as part of a controversial move to reduce the number of Scots MPs from 59 to 53.

The originals proposals from the Boundary Commission for Scotland included combining areas of South Perthshire and Kinross-shire with communities in South Fife.

More than 100 responses – most of them passionately opposed to the proposals – were submitted, exposing the depth of feeling on local identity in the area.

Brian Bell, from Kinross, said the proposals were drawn up by “someone without any brain cells”.

“The people of Kinross have absolutely nothing in common with those from Kelty, Lochgelly, Cowdenbeath and Burntisland.”

Derek Redfern, of Crieff, described the plans as a “dog’s dinner”.

“The Ochil & South Perthshire constituency represents rural communities with no historical connections to the industrial Fife constituencies in question,” he said.

David McAllister, from Burntisland, said: “It’s a crazy idea to create an area that links Burntisland with Perthshire. We have no connection with the likes of Crieff.”

Patricia Duncan, from Dunblane, reminded officials of the upset caused when it was proposed Fife was split in two in the 1970s, adding: “You tamper with Fife at your peril!”

Commissioners say they have listened to the concerns and made changes, published in The Courier on Tuesday, which includes linking South Perthshire with Stirling and Dunfermline with Clackmannanshire instead.

Meanwhile, leading polling experts have estimated Theresa May would have won a Commons majority for the Conservatives of about 16 if the snap general election in June had taken place using the revised plans.

Their calculations were based on the revised recommendations issued by the boundary commissions for England, Scotland and Wales, as well as the initial proposals from the Northern Ireland Boundary Commission, which has not so far published revised plans.

The analysis was led by Professors Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher, emeritus professors of politics at the University of Plymouth and Associate Members of Nuffield College, Oxford.

Profs Rallings and Thrasher said their research “suggests a Conservative majority of 16 – or effectively 25 if Sinn Fein are assumed not to take their seats”.

The claims may provide ammunition for critics who argue the changes, if implemented, will have the impact of making it easier for Conservatives to win power.

Profs Rallings and Thrasher noted that in comparing the revised proposals for England, Scotland and Wales with the provisional proposals announced a year ago, it appeared the Conservatives had been successful in arguing their case for revisions during the consultations on the provisional plans, especially in England.

The academics calculate that if the revised plans had been in place for the snap general election in June the Conservatives could well have won an overall majority in the Commons, which is due to see a reduction in the number of MPs from 650 to 600 under the proposals.

gmcpherson@thecourier.co.uk