Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Professor Hugh Pennington: ‘Herd immunity is a crazy idea, not really supported by any sound science’

Sir Patrick Vallance and Dominic Cummings were both said to have supported a herd immunity strategy before changing course.
Sir Patrick Vallance and Dominic Cummings were both said to have supported a herd immunity strategy before changing course.

A leading microbiologist has criticised a controversial “herd immunity” policy as a “crazy idea” to tackle coronavirus and one that should have never been aired in public.

Professor Hugh Pennington, who is based in Aberdeen, said the proposal, in which a large portion of the public are exposed to the disease in a bid to build up immunity, would result in around half a million deaths in the UK.

He added that the policy should “never have been speculated about” as all the evidence so far shows that the virus settles down “long before” herd immunity is reached.

An article published by The Sunday Times reported on the strategy of the Prime Minister’s chief adviser, Dominic Cummings, towards the outbreak – which was described by sources for the paper in late February as “herd immunity, protect the economy and if that means some pensioners die, too bad”.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s key adviser Dominic Cummings.

However, Downing Street today denied suggestions Mr Cummings was prepared to let the elderly die to protect the economy, adding the claims had not been put to them before publication.

It comes after Sir Patrick Vallance, the UK’s chief scientific adviser, caused alarm earlier this month talking about “herd immunity”, suggesting between 60-80% of the population becoming infected could stop the virus returning in the winter.

Prof Pennington said: “It was mentioned as a kind of long-term hope. This is a lot of old rubbish because with herd immunity you’ve got to have a majority of the population infected and we know what the mortality rate is.

“That would mean, optimistically, about half a million people would die because of the mortality rate and the number of people in 60% of the population.

“It was a crazy idea and not really supported by any sound science anyway. It may come to that but nobody is expecting it to and it certainly hasn’t come to that in China.

“The idea of herd immunity to the Chinese would mean more than a billion people and half of them being infected. It just hasn’t happened. The numbers are far, far short of that while they have basically seen the virus off. It’s a long, long way before we get anywhere close to that here.”

Professor Hugh Pennington.

 

‘Mistake’ to air in public

Prof Pennington also said the it was a “bad mistake” to talk about the idea in public, which had been put forward to deal with a “disaster” situation.

He said: “The whole idea was a terrible idea and whoever put it forward should have kept it secret. This is the worst, worst, worst case scenario, worse than 1918 flu in terms of numbers of people dying.

“To talk about it in public was a bad mistake … and it should never have been speculated about because all the evidence we have so far about the virus is it doesn’t behave like that. It goes away long before you get herd immunity.”

Prof Pennington said not enough emphasis has been placed on the “assumptions” which mathematical models work on, adding the government appeared to be “in the hands of mathematical modellers”.

He said: “I’m reluctant to criticise without knowing what’s gone on in secret meetings but the government does appear to be in the hands of the mathematical modellers.

“There’s nothing wrong with a model itself, that’s fine, but on the other hand it depends on lots of assumptions. If it’s done with incorrect assumptions then you get the wrong answers and I don’t think there’s been enough emphasis on that.

“What to do is a political decision. You look at the models, talk to other experts, look at what history has told us about flu as that’s all we have to go on, look at what happened with SARS and put all that into your thinking and then the politicians have to make the final decisions.”