Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

EXPLAINED: The complex ownership structure at Raith Rovers amid potential club sale

Stark's Park. Image: SNS.
Stark's Park. Image: SNS.

“It operates more simply than it looks on paper,” says Alan Russell of Raith Supporters Trust.

Following the news – broken by Courier Sport – that Raith Rovers are seeking new investment and could be sold, we spoke to the fan group chief about his preferred way forward for the club.

Courier Sport also asked Russell to explain the complex ownership model at Stark’s Park.

In an article for Scottish football periodical Nutmeg in 2017, Russell described it as “one of the most complicated structures in Scottish football”.

Four companies

Russell tells Courier Sport the main difference is that where most clubs will have one or two companies that own the club and stadium, “what we have at Raith Rovers is we have four”.

“So we have two holding companies that are in the middle,” he adds.

The club has the usual two – Raith Rovers Football Club Ltd and Stark’s Park Properties Ltd.

Then there are two holding companies: Raith Rovers FC Holdings Ltd, set up in 1994 to allow new investment; and New Raith Rovers Ltd, part of the Reclaim The Rovers community takeover in 2005 when the future of Stark’s Park was threatened.

Raith Supporters Trust has a useful infographic on its website. Infographic: Raith Supporters Trust.

In 2017 John Sim – already the majority shareholder in Stark’s Park Properties Ltd – became the majority shareholder in New Raith Rovers Ltd, giving him a controlling interest in both the club and the stadium.

“In the current level of ownership, [the two holding companies] are almost redundant because the control is in Stark’s Park Properties and the footballing activity is in Raith Rovers Football Club Ltd.

“So it’s a club now where the stadium and the football club are owned, by and large, by the same people.”

Russell is a proponent of fan ownership, mainly as it guards against the kind of threats to the stadium that rallied the fans in the mid-2000s.

That’s not to say he thinks the period under Sim has been a poor one – or that fan ownership comes without its flaws.

Stability and security

Compared to the likes of the Claude Anelka years he says it’s been a “relatively good period for the club”.

“At the moment, with the club owned by the same individual [as the stadium], it doesn’t have that vulnerability about it,” continues Russell.

“But it does mean that things can change rapidly and the costs of running that football club are theoretically separate from the ownership of the stadium.

Sim have overseen a ‘relatively good period for the club’. Images: SNS.

“And when any new owner comes in, if it splits control of the ownership of the two companies, then that’s a risk to the football club.

“We’ve seen clubs in the past, in Scotland and elsewhere, become vulnerable because people want to but the physical aspect but don’t want responsibility for the football club.

“Under John Sim we’ve had someone with a controlling interest in both, that’s given us a period of stability and security.

“Even if at times we haven’t really know what his intentions were.

“But he’s done good things for the football club, for the community and in developing the stadium.”

  • You can read Alan Russell’s Nutmeg article in full here
  • The Raith Supporters Trust website can be found by following this link and a direct link to its infographic (used above) is here. 

Conversation