Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Argument over who pays for Laurencekirk crossing

The A90 junction at Laurencekirk.
The A90 junction at Laurencekirk.

An argument over where the buck stops on A90 road safety seems to have concluded “no one wants to pay for” what both sides agree is necessary.

Angus North and Mearns SNP MSP Nigel Don and campaigner David May agree on the need for a new, safe crossing on the A90 at the south end of Laurencekirk.

However, Mr Don has criticised roads agency Transport Scotland for refusing to foot the bill, while local councillor Mr May claims “the buck now stops” with the Scottish Government to improve infrastructure, especially after receiving £394 million in extra capital funding from Westminster.

Both men have been campaigning for a flyover for years.

Mr Don said: “Everyone seems to agree a flyover is necessary, but no one wants to pay for it. Aberdeenshire Council rightly point out this is a trunk road and not their responsibility.

“Transport Scotland say housing developers should pay for it. But given the current state of the market and the sites available at the south end of Laurencekirk, that’s simply not going to happen. Meantime, drivers risk their lives every day.”

He added: “If a flyover could be built for a garden centre between Dundee and Perth on the A90, then surely Laurencekirk has a very strong case.

“Furthermore, the Scottish Government has recently announced plans for A9 dualling between Perth and Inverness, which has included grade separated junctions throughout.”

Mr May called on Mr Don to put the matter to the transport minister Keith Brown and finance minister John Swinney.

“I agree with Mr Don that no-one wishes to take responsibility for paying for it,” he said. “Therefore the buck now stops with the Scottish Government, and they recently received an extra £394m of capital funding from the UK Government, so money is available for extra infrastructure projects.”

Transport Scotland has not deemed the black spot a priority, despite four fatal collisions, 15 serious and 22 slight-injury accidents on the road between 1999 and 2010.

Hope for action was rekindled near the start of the year when transport minister Keith Brown visited the site to make his own decision on the junction immediately ordering a review of the costings.

Original estimates ranged from £4m to £23m, and Transport Scotland was asked bring an exact figure to the table. It was subsequently announced that measures to make the road safer by installing a grade separated junction would cost £13.5m.

In a letter to Transport Scotland economics expert David Anderson, Mr Don said: “There is no possibility of there being enough building close to the south junction for this to make a significant contribution.”

He quotes a passage from the Aberdeenshire Local Development Plan which said: “The land values in Laurencekirk are not sufficient to afford both trunk road improvements, and may make development in Laurencekirk undeliverable.”

“The Scottish Government has put significant investment into the reopening of Laurencekirk railway station and the development of Mearns Academy,” he added.

“To get the best out of that investment, we need more house building. For that to happen, we need a flyover.”

Local campaigner Jill Fotheringham had previously said Transport Scotland had no intention of providing a flyover or any other major safety measures at the junction, and claimed a cost refinement exercise had been carried out from an office, without staff bothering to revisit the site.

She said the whole review had been a “paper exercise” carried out by the Scottish Government for publicity purposes.