Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Reporter overturns planning rejection for Hilltown development

Site of proposed council housing development at the junction of, left, Nelson Street and right, Ann Street on the Hilltown, Dundee.
Site of proposed council housing development at the junction of, left, Nelson Street and right, Ann Street on the Hilltown, Dundee.

A Scottish Government planning reporter has given the go-ahead for a development on a Dundee site.

Iain Urquhart overturned the city council’s refusal to grant planning approval in principle for 12 flats and a shop at a gap site on Hilltown.

Granting the appeal from Richard Gillis, of Sydhar Properties, he said the development could encourage others to invest in the area and help in the regeneration of the Hilltown.

The application was rejected by councillors in May, despite being backed by the director of city development Mike Galloway.

The site at 224-232 Hilltown was formerly occupied by a tenement block but has been derelict since it was ravaged by fire.

Mr Urquhart accepted the plan put forward “falls far short” of the standards for outside space and car parking set down in the Dundee local plan.

“However, I do not consider that this situation would be much different from some of the existing flatted tenement property in this part of Hilltown,” he said.

He continued: “I accept that in the current economic climate and in an area of low or modest land values it would be very difficult to justify on-site parking for a relatively modest residential and shop development.”

He did not consider the absence of on-site parking would create any significant problems in the area, adding: “It seems to me that the vacant appeal site is very unlikely to be redeveloped if it has to meet local plan standards for amenity and car parking space.”

The plan for a block rising to three or four storeys “would fit well with adjoining tenement property of similar style and would help to re-establish the building fabric and urban form in an area of transition where there are several cleared sites awaiting redevelopment.”

Mr Urquhart said he agreed with Mr Galloway that the development would make “a positive contribution to the wider objectives of the Hilltown regeneration framework”.

“This initiative aims to improve investor confidence in the area, increase housing choice and secure physical renewal,” he went on.

Those are important considerations which particularly in the current economic climate outweigh the failure to meet the planning standards.

The developer will now have to submit detailed plans to the local authority for approval before work can start on the site.