Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Supporters confident of future for St Andrews Botanic Garden but not without change

Kim Cessford, Courier - 31.05.11 - pictured is the entrance to the Botanic Gardens in St Andrews
Kim Cessford, Courier - 31.05.11 - pictured is the entrance to the Botanic Gardens in St Andrews

A popular Fife attraction at the centre of a funding crisis could yet enjoy a bright future following a series of negotiations between interested parties.

The Courier understands the group will report its findings in the autumn. Mr Waterston said there was also “substantial discussion” around the idea of putting some parts of the grounds up for sale to raise capital. “It was recognised that it might be unavoidable, but the issue needs very careful consideration and any decisions will await further deliberation when more information is available,” the councillor said. Mr Waterston is confident of a “viable future” for the attraction. “The Botanic Garden is much loved by the people of St Andrews, and there is substantial apprehension about the uncertainties ahead,” he said. “However, it is clear that both the university and the council are committed to ensuring a viable future for the garden and the wonderful asset that it is. “We are looking ahead positively and realistically, and the sub-group will be working hard over the summer to bring forward more detailed proposals regarding the formation of the new trust.” St Andrews Botanic Garden, established at Bassaguard in 1960, has been managed by the council since 1987 and costs £300,000 a year to run. Environmental consultancy Natural Capital, which was previously commissioned to review the garden, recommended a “partnership model” of management, with funding from the council, university and a charitable, community or commercial organisation. Its report said current operational arrangements are weak and a lack of strategic direction and investment have caused stagnation in recent years. It also criticised limited public awareness of the facility’s existence. It suggests a cafe, a more substantial plant sales outlet and greater use of the garden for events could provide extra income and that an attractive pedestrian gateway from the town centre may attract more visitors.

Last month The Courier revealed the future of the Botanic Gardens in St Andrews was in the balance after Fife Council said it is unable to continue supporting it at current levels.

St Andrews University, which owns the land, is unwilling to make up the shortfall.

But Councillor Robin Waterston has revealed efforts to secure the gardens’ future have taken a “step forward” but warned a sale of at least part of the site may be “unavoidable”.

He spoke out following a joint meeting of the garden committee and botanic gardens education trust. Chaired by Mr Waterston, the meeting considered proposals by Stephen Magee of the university and Grant Ward of Fife Council surrounding the possible formation of a new trust to take over the running of the gardens.

Although a potential solution, they warn that the background of the severe financial squeeze on all public agencies means innovative thinking and more efficient ways of working will be required.

Mr Magee and Mr Ward emphasised the determination of both bodies to ensure the future of the garden as a highly valued public facility, but also warned change is inevitable.

They agreed their common goal is to promote a sustainable future through “sympathetic and carefully managed” development. The meeting agreed to support the principle of a trust, and to take this forward by forming a sub-group to do a more detailed “options appraisal.”

The sub-group has now been asked to look at various trust models and to arrange an audit of the botanical value of each element of the garden which recently received an improved ‘excellent’ rating from VisitScotland. Members will then consider possible sources of both capital and revenue funding.

Continued…