Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fife Council denies paying too much for new Madras College site

Kris Miller, Courier, 03/10/12. Picture today shows land at Pipelands, St Andrews which is one of the potential sites for new Madras school. See Mike Alexander story.
Kris Miller, Courier, 03/10/12. Picture today shows land at Pipelands, St Andrews which is one of the potential sites for new Madras school. See Mike Alexander story.

Fife Council has been accused of paying well over the odds for the St Andrews farmland on which a new secondary school will be built.

It has agreed to stump up £1.8 million for 30 acres of prime agricultural land at Pipeland Farm, on the town’s southern boundary.

Conservative councillor Andy Heer claimed the site was worth only £150,000, a fraction of what the authority is to pay owner Muir Group for it.

As it is part of the town’s green belt, development of the land is severely restricted, affecting its market value.

Mr Heer said £1.8 million approved by the district valuer was a “jaw-dropping” price, amounting to £60,000 per acre and 10 times the going rate for top-grade agricultural land.

He said: “This is 30 acres of farmland in the greenbelt. You can’t build houses on it, you can’t put a golf course on it. Why are we paying £1.8 million for it?

“We all want to see a new school built as soon as possible but that doesn’t excuse paying far more than the land is worth.”

As the cost was revealed to the council’s education, social and communities scrutiny committee yesterday, SNP councillor David Mogg demanded a report be prepared detailing the background to the purchase.

He also questioned whether the sum which will be included in the £42 million budget for replacing Madras College would compromise facilities for pupils.

He said: “To say the developers have us over a barrel is probably the least professional way of saying it but they must have paid less than £150,000 for this land in the first place and they are getting £1.8 million for it. I’m not happy we seem to be paying over the odds for a piece of land.

“What are we going to have to cut back on in the building of the school to accommodate (paying) £1.8 million for the land?”

Education spokesperson, Bryan Poole, insisted the council had neither been held over a barrel nor paid too much. Choosing the site has been a long, drawn-out process fraught with controversy. Urging against dwelling on the land cost, he said: “We are in great danger of reopening something when we are making good progress. We need to move on.

“That community has been waiting for a school for goodness knows how long. The price was negotiated between the council and the owner and it was accepted by the district valuer.”

The committee voted against Mr Mogg’s request for a report.

Property services senior manager Alan Paul denied the council had had a weak negotiating hand but said that lawyers advised the pursuit of a compulsory purchase order would likely be unsuccessful. “Negotiations had to bear that in mind,” he said.

All sorts of factors were taken into account during the setting of the price, he said, including the land’s proximity to the town, availability of services and the fact that before its recent inclusion in the green belt, a sizeable portion had been set aside for commercial development.

He added: “We still expect to be able to be build an excellent facility for the budget.”

The replacement of Madras College, presently split over two sites, is at the first stage of the planning process. Fife Council has formally stated its intention to develop known as lodging a proposal of application notice and the next stage is submitting a planning application.

It is intended pupils will be in the new building in the 2016/17 academic year.