Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fife quarry operator appeals against planning refusal

Jane Hutchinson looks out over the land that may be turned into a quarry.
Jane Hutchinson looks out over the land that may be turned into a quarry.

A quarry operator is fighting Fife Council’s refusal to allow it to extract two million tonnes of sand and gravel from farmland in the Howe of Fife.

Earlier this year the local authority declined planning permission for a quarry at Kinloch Farm, near Collessie.

Residents in the area had campaigned against the 82-hectare development and a leading NHS Fife consultant had warned that neighbours’ health could be put at risk from dust.

However, Laird Aggregates has appealed to Scottish ministers to overturn the decision by the council’s North East Fife area committee.

It has accused the committee of unreasonable behaviour and claims it had no justifiable reason to refuse planning permission.

The firm’s legal agents, Wright, Johnston & Mackenzie, told the Scottish Government’s directorate for planning and environmental appeals that: “Detailed evidence was provided to demonstrate that the proposal complies with national and regional planning guidance and standards recognised industry-wide as best practice.

“This evidence has been subjected to detailed scrutiny by the council’s professional advisory bodies as statutory consultees.

“All statutory consultees concluded that, with appropriate conditioning, the development was acceptable.”

Laird Aggregates proposes to operate the quarry for almost 15 years before restoring the land.

Official reasons for planning refusal were that the development would have a detrimental visual impact, significant cumulative effects on residential amenity, road safety and visual amenity, trees would have to be removed and there was no evidence of a deficiency of aggregates for the construction industry.

However, Laird Aggregates pointed out those differed from the reasons agreed by councillors at their meeting on February 27, which it said were not justified by any evidence.

Laird Aggregates claimed the potential for noise, dust, environmental and air quality impact was low or negligible.

It also argued there was a demonstrated need for the sand and gravel, that seven jobs would be created and that local firms would be employed for supplies, maintenance and specialist support.

Giffordtown Community Council has pledged to challenge the appeal and has accused the company of submitting a flood of information with its appeal at a time of year when objectors may have little time to digest it.

Chairwoman Jane Hutchinson said: “This appeal is not unexpected since there is so much at stake for people on either side of the discussion.

“Participation will be extremely time-consuming for objectors in the course of high summer whereas the appellant company and their agents seem to have embarked on professional saturation bombing precisely when most local residents are embarking on their main summer holidays.”

Photo by David Wardle