Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fife residents will not pick up Lomond Homes bill

Fife residents will not pick up Lomond Homes bill

Householders in Lochgelly and Blairhall have welcomed news they will not have to fork out thousands of pounds as a result of Fife housebuilder Lomond Homes going into administration.

Members of Fife Council’s Executive Committee have agreed that the outstanding debts of Lomond Homes will not be passed on to homeowners.

At the executive committee meeting in Fife House on Tuesday, officers presented a report on the legal status of Section 75 agreements. These are used as part of the planning process to make sure the financial contributions required for amenities and local services are paid.

However, because they burden the land, house owners can be held liable for money owed.

There was unanimous support for a motion from executive member Mark Hood, Lochgelly Labour councillor, to agree that, given the circumstances, individual householders should not be held liable for Lomond Homes’ financial obligations.

Mr Hood said: “Lomond Homes repeatedly failed to honour their legal and moral obligations to both the council and the people who bought new homes from them in good faith. And, now that the company is in administration, it’s unlikely we will recover any money from them.

“Council officers worked in good faith with the company in a difficult economic climate and tried to be flexible to support a local business but we all acknowledge that there are lessons to be learned from the way the case was handled.

“The homeowners have been caught up in an extremely stressful situation, through no fault of their own, and we have no intention of adding to this by burdening them with a large bill. I’m delighted that we have been able to confirm this position once and for all.”

Committee members heard that invoices will now be automatically sent to developers as trigger points are reached in building projects and the council will quickly start recovery proceedings, including obtaining interdicts to stop further building if payments are not made promptly.

Fife Council Leader Alex Rowley said: “Developers must understand that we will not allow this situation to happen again. We have changed our planning and financial procedures to make sure obligations will always be met in the future, so that neither the council nor home buyers are ever left high and dry again.”

Fife councillor Ian Chisholm, who is the SNP member for Lochgelly and Cardenden, welcomed the decision.

He said:“Good sense seems to have prevailed and pressure from the residents’ association, with support from myself, seems to have concentrated minds on the immorality of pursuing this dubious claim of more than £4,000 on homeowners.

“The administration are now saying that individual owners should not be held liable in the specific cases in Lochgelly and Blairhall.

“I just wonder why the issue had to go to the extreme lengths of an executive meeting, with the worry that the owners have had to put up with. Given that officers were tardy, at the very least, in pursuing the debt from Lomond Homes, I do believe there would have been a breach of natural justice should the council have taken dubious legal action.”

Ethne Brown, who moved from Stirling with her husband Ian to New Farm Vale in Lochgelly last October, said: “We are obviously very, very pleased councillors agreed unanimously that Lomond Homes’ directors were wrong in what they are doing in relation to Section 75 agreements.

“Also, that they highlighted some inconsistencies with the practice that was going on in the council and an acknowledgement that this was the first time Section 75 payments were not paid. This has set a precedent and we hope lessons have been learned.”