Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Complaints over cost of Dunfermline flood protection scheme

Flood scheme meeting in Dunfermline.
Flood scheme meeting in Dunfermline.

Fife Council has apologised over Dunfermline’s £24.6 million flood prevention scheme and admitted it has “failed” on budget and timescale.

During a public meeting on Wednesday evening, head of transportation, Dr Bob McLellan, apologised for delays to the project as he faced an angry tirade from residents.

He was grilled by a resident of Liggar’s Place, who said: “It’s been a disaster for people, who have had tractors sitting in their garden for three and a half years and people coming in and out and nobody telling us a word of what’s happening.

“By what criteria would the council determine that this has been a failure?

“I mean by that, at what level of budget expenditure would Fife Council determine it a failure, or what level of time expenditure, or what level of distress to residents or what level of mess left over?

“How many people would have to experience flooding as a result of the scheme for it to be a failure?

“When will the council say they’re sorry?”

Dr McLellan said: “In terms of budget, it has failed. In terms of time, it has failed. In terms of performance, it can’t fail because it will deliver a scheme that is fit for purpose.

“I’m not going to apologise for the whole scheme. It’s taken far longer than we would have liked but no matter what way anyone in the room wants to frame it, the finished product will give far more added value.

“The criteria for success is that this scheme will afford protection to 175 homes for a period of up to 200 years. I accept that we’ve been here longer than we would have liked to be.”

Work to bolster Dunfermline’s flood defences started in May 2007 and should have been completed in 2009. It is aimed at protecting 175 Dunfermline properties from the effects of a one-in-200-year storm.

However, the project is not expected to be finished until June next year and the cost has escalated from the initial estimate of £14m.

The Scottish Government agreed to pay 80% of the original cost but the Fife taxpayer will have to cover any extra, depending on how much the council can claw back.

The council appointed Atkins Limited as design contractors, who were represented at the meeting in the Dell Farquharson Community Leisure Centre.

During the meeting, an Atkins representative said the work would not prevent gardens from being flooded but Dr McLellan said he would challenge this.

He added: “I’m not any more keen to have flooding in gardens at the end of a £25 million project.”

Former MSP Jim Tolson, who spoke as a concerned resident, said: “I’m disgusted at the way people have been treated here.”

He told the officials there was a “serious problem right in front of your eyes” at one stretch of burn not covered by the flood prevention scheme, where the embankment was collapsing.

A number of residents received £900 payments earlier in the scheme but local surveyor Rod McRea said the council was not obliged to make further payments and some residents were looking to the Lands Tribunal for compensation.

“These are people who don’t have the money to fight their own corner,” he said.

A resident read an extract from the Flood Prevention (Scotland) Act 1961, which stated compensation should equal the cost of damage, adding: “We deserve to have decent compensation.”