Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Minister defends award of public cash to T in the Park amid angry claims of ‘fraudulent application’

Culture Secretary Fiona Hyslop appears before Holyrood's Education and Culture Committee.
Culture Secretary Fiona Hyslop appears before Holyrood's Education and Culture Committee.

T in the Park organisers warned they could move out of Scotland unless they could address the “severely reduced revenues” associated with its relocation to Strathallan before the Scottish Government awarded them £150,000 of state aid, Culture Secretary Fiona Hyslop has said.

The claim was met by incredulity from MSPs – including an SNP member – during a heated session of Holyrood’s Education and Culture Committee in which Ms Hyslop was accused of funding a “fraudulent application” by organisers DF Concerts with “a whiff of cronyism” due to former government adviser Jennifer Dempsie’s role in facilitating key meetings.

Ms Hyslop was asked why the Scottish Government provided state aid to a profitable company with a major corporate sponsor.

She said: “The Scottish Government provides funding to profitable companies to safeguard jobs and support the economy in all of the sectors that are part of the key economic strategy of the Government.

“However, in relation to T in the Park, the costs of the transition, particularly the unanticipated costs, meant that, in the terms that they themselves have given information, that a seven-figure amount was required to provide for those costs, in particular moving from Balado to Strathallan.

“In light of the seven-figure costs and also in relation to the severely reduced revenues that they were anticipating, as provided to us in their budgeting in relation to that event, meant that the event itself, for this year certainly and in years going forward, would not be in a position that they would want to continue.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=q71AkB_HN9I%3Frel%3D0

“Shareholders of the company were giving them an indication that it would be preferable for them to move, if there was not profitability for the event itself, from the multi-day, multi-stage festival which brings the economic benefit to rural Perthshire, to a single-day, single-stage event possibly in other cities like Glasgow as they have been doing recently.

“Or to move the festival itself away from Scotland.

“That would have the economic situation where the £15.4 million of economic benefit coming to Scotland would no longer be in Scotland.”

Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur said: “You’ve got an event that’s sponsored by Tennent’s, who I would have thought would have had some concerns about an existential threat to the event or it moving to a single-stage, single-day event and therefore could have been approached in relation to their own approach to the event.”

SNP MSP Chic Brodie said: “Because of the economic nature I disavow the notion that T in the Park, which is co-joined with Scotland, that they would move.”

Ms Hyslop said: “It was clear to me that the organisers faced a number of unanticipated additional costs in staging the event as a result of the requirement to move from the previous site at Balado and three-year only time-limited condition attached to the planning consent attached to the new site at Strathallan.

“Following a detailed consideration of options I approved £150,000 from the major events budget for operation costs associated with the transition to the new site.”

Conservative MSP Mary Scanlon said: “Can I put it to the Cabinet Secretary that this was a done deal given the applicant’s close connection with the SNP?

“£150,000 to a company with multimillion-pound profits. You decided to allocate the money then you scurried round the state aid, which included more that £150,000 worth of officials’ time, to find which budget it might fit into.

“The request was for infrastructure, but under no circumstances should this money have been paid for infrastructure.

“So if this was not a fraudulent application I would like the Cabinet Secretary to tell us why.”

Committee convener Stewart Maxwell said: “I would just urge caution about that language. Just be careful.”

Ms Scanlon said: “Well I would be very happy if she told us there was nothing fraudulent here.”

Ms Hyslop said: “I’m sure you will take the guidance of this committee very carefully in terms of the language that was used and the allegations that have been made.”

She added: “The applicant Geoff Ellis (DF Concerts chief) has, as far as I am aware, no associations with the SNP. It was Geoff Ellis I met with, Geoff Ellis I had the discussions with.”

She said she was permitted to provide “operational state aid for the transition specifically for venue hire and costs specific to the transition i.e. planning consultants costs”.

Labour MSP Mark Griffin said there was “a whiff of cronyism” surrounding Ms Dempsie’s involvement.

Ms Hyslop admitted she did meet Ms Dempsie and Mr Ellis at the SNP conference, and said Mr Ellis attempted to discuss T in the Park’s difficulties there.

However, she said she did not know that requests for an official meeting to her private office came from Ms Dempsie.

Asked if she met Ms Dempsie at the SNP conference, she said: “Yes I did, very briefly, and because Geoff Ellis wanted to let me know about the concerns about it they were looking at the planning.

“Because it was planning, as I do with everybody, I said as a Government minister I can’t discuss planning issues.

“He told me about ospreys and the environmental work they were doing on ospreys, but I made it quite clear because it was still subject to a planning condition by Perth & Kinross Council I could hear what he was saying but I couldn’t discuss anything.”

She added: “I didn’t know that the request for a meeting came from Jennifer Dempsie.

“Jennifer Dempsie didn’t attend the meeting that we had with DF Concerts, and indeed I had no discussions about funding with Jennifer Dempsie.”

She continued: “She was a staff member for DF Concerts. If she worked in terms of arranging diaries for Geoff Ellis that is a matter for DF Concerts.

“In terms of her connections with me, I know of her having worked as a special adviser finishing her contract, I think, in 2009.

“So in the last six years I’ve not had a relationship with her either in terms of friendship or anything like that.”

She went on: “She wasn’t a consultant, so in relation to some of the payment issues, for example in relation to the grant for venue hire and planning consultants, that would not have gone to Jen Dempsie because Jen Dempsie was an employee of the DF Concerts.”

Labour MSP John Pentland said: “Why then would a private company be able to secure direct access to the Cabinet Secretary through a former aide to Alex Salmond rather than go through official channels?”

Ms Hyslop said: “Government meets with business people all the time… particularly when there are issues of concern.”

She added: “I don’t decide who DF Concerts employ or don’t employ.

“I don’t expect everybody in Scottish Government, the thousands of civil servants that we employ, to know who she is or to alert me.

“I don’t think people should have to show a party card in order to work for their employer, I think that would be an incorrect situation.”