Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Stagecoach boss fails in bid to build houses on Perthshire estate

Ann Gloag strongly denied human trafficking charges. The crown office has said it will make no further proceedings against her and three other defendents.
Ann Gloag strongly denied human trafficking charges. The crown office has said it will make no further proceedings against her and three other defendents.

Stagecoach boss Ann Gloag has had a bid to build three houses near her Perthshire home refused.

Ms Gloag wanted to build the row of three terraced cottages on a former steading a mile from Kinfauns Castle.

The 71-year-old originally had permission for the site granted in 2008 but building work did not start before it expired and she had to reapply.

Council planning bosses refused to renew planning permission after deciding the buildings did not fit in with the local development plan.

The area, at Hill Park, on the outskirts of Perth, is also a designated green belt site, where only buildings linked to agriculture and forestry can be built.

In a report, officials said: “The proposal is located within an area of great landscape value.

“Accordingly, the proposal is contrary to…the Perth Area Local Plan, which states ‘there will be a presumption against built development, except for development necessary for operational need’.

“It is located within the Perth Green Belt (and) accordingly, the proposal is contrary to policy…where development will only be permitted where it can be demonstrated it is essential for agriculture, horticulture (including allotments) or forestry operations appropriate to the green belt.

“The proposed development is also not considered to be an appropriate form of development within the green belt.

“Finally, the proposal is not in accordance with the development plan and there are no material reasons which justify departing from the development plan.”

A spokesman for Ms Gloag said she did not wish to comment.