Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Plans for ‘sustainable village’ at Errol Airfield given more time

Plans to build 240 homes at Errol Airfield  have been given more time.
Plans to build 240 homes at Errol Airfield have been given more time.

A planned 240-home “sustainable village” at Errol Airfield has been given more time to come to fruition.

Members of Perth and Kinross Council’s development management committee yesterday agreed to extend the time limit for work starting to three years, instead of the proposed two, after an architect told councillors the latter would have given them “insufficient time” to agree necessary matters with around 10 different bodies.

Outline planning consent for the concept was granted to Morris Leslie three years ago and is due to expire this month.

The application site covers more than 43 hectares of Errol Airfield on land adjacent to its runways.

Perth and Kinross Council granted a planning in principle consent in 2010 for a mixed use development with houses, industrial starter units, workshops, warehouses and associated offices.

Bob Hynd, of architects Leadingham, Jameson, Rogers and Hynd, acting on behalf of Morris Leslie, told committee members of his firm’s “worry” over the recommendation to grant just a two-year extension, to be backdated to October last year.

“This effectively allows us only 20 months, instead of 36, to agree the outstanding reserved matters,” he said.

“As this is a major application, our experience is that this is insufficient time to agree the outstanding matters with the various departments such as education, parks, planning, roads, and bodies such as Network Rail, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa).

“In total, there are probably in excess of 10 different parties to deal with and a considerable number of individuals. We think it would be very difficult to achieve full agreement with all the parties involved within this timescale.”

Mr Hynd told the committee the number of reserved matters require “considerable more consideration and discussion”.

He added: “I think the 20 months is insufficient time.

“As you are aware, the construction industry has collapsed and there has been a considerable downturn in the amount of new housebuild completions over the last few years.

“Scottish Government figures state that within the Perth and Kinross Council area there were 1,086 houses built in 2007.

“However, there were only 353 in 2012 the last year figures were available.

“This resulted in lengthier discussions with the developers who have expressed an interest and negotiations regarding longer timescales.

“We would, therefore, ask that the existing recommendation be carried forward, but it would only be fair and reasonable to have an amendment to condition this for three years.”

Councillor Ian Campbell told Mr Hynd he felt the planners could have had “ongoing” discussions after it was granted principle consent and Nick Brian, Perth and Kinross Council’s development quality manager, agreed.

“I would have thought some discussions could have taken place during this time,” he commented.

Councillor Alan Livingstone said he believed there was unanimity on the committee that the construction industry had “collapsed”.

He asked Mr Hynd if he felt it could come out of “hibernation”.

Mr Hynd said: “It is possible. Four years ago we had 23 staff but we have only 10 now.

“However, we recently took on two architects so there seems to be a slight improvement.”

Councillor Callum Gillies proposed an amendment that the time limit be extended to three years.

The committee voted 7-5 in favour of the motion.