Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Court of Session to consider plans for controversial Perth housing project

Court of Session to consider plans for controversial Perth housing project

A controversial plan for a major new housing scheme at Perth will come before one of Scotland’s top law courts, The Courier can reveal.

The Pilkington Trust’s contentious Almond Valley proposal will be considered by the Court of Session following its rejection by Government ministers.

Perth and Kinross Council refused the initial idea of 1,800 homes in December, 2011, and it was removed from the local development plan a month later.

If passed, a primary school and leisure, retail and office facilities would also have been built, in addition to the housing development built on land next to Huntingtowerfield and Ruthvenfield, to the west of Perth.

The Pilkington Trust appealed the local authority’s refusal to the Scottish Government and this led to a public inquiry being held last July, at which representatives from all concerned parties attended.

During the hearing, it was established that the Almond Valley Village plan had reduced the number of homes to 1,500.

Following the public inquiry, the Scottish Government’s Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA) reporter, Katrina Rice, dismissed the Pilkington Trust’s appeal on the basis that “conformity with the development plan is outweighed by conflict with the emerging local development plan.”

In her findings, Ms Rice stated: “I have considered all other matters raised both before and during the inquiry and hearing sessions. I find none to alter my conclusion that this appeal should be dismissed.”

The Almond Valley proposal attracted 51 representations supporting the removal of the site from the local development plan and five seeking its reinstatement.

The Courier has now learnt that the Pilkington Trust have appealed the Scottish Government Reporter’s decision to the Court of Session in Edinburgh.

In addition, there may be another hearing held by the DPEA in Perth, where further submissions could be heard.

Alastair Wood, planning director with Savills, who act on behalf of the Pilkington Trust, previously claimed that he felt the Almond Valley plan “remains” the “most desirable” proposal for strategic housing in north-west Perth.

He had said: “It’s (the Reporter’s dismissal) a shame as this creates a further delay and causes uncertainty for development and economic growth for Perth.”

A spokesperson for the DPEA confirmed the matter will now be heard at the Court of Session.

She said: “Scottish Ministers appointed a reporter to consider an appeal against the decision of Perth and Kinross Council to refuse planning permission in principle for a residential led development to provide up to 1,800 new homes, a primary school, leisure, retail and office facilities on land adjacent to Huntingtowerfield and Ruthvenfield, Perthshire.

“The Reporter dismissed the appeal after careful consideration of all the information submitted, including a series of inquiry and hearing sessions. The inquiry session dealt with transportation matters.

“The hearing sessions dealt with the environmental impact assessment, the impact on Double Dykes caravan site, the development plan background-reasons for refusal and planning conditions.

“The decision is currently the subject of an appeal to the Court of Session. As this legal process is ongoing, it would be inappropriate for Scottish Ministers to comment further at this stage.”

A three-day hearing will take place next month.