Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Debate on flood concern

Debate on flood concern

FEARS OVER flooding have delayed a decision on a controversial housing development.

Councillors and residents expressed their concerns that building five new properties on farmland at Errol would cause chaos during times of heavy rain.

Despite investigations by Sepa (Scottish Environment Protection Agency) and Perth and Kinross Council’s flooding team concluding that there is no adverse risk, those opposing the plans remain unconvinced.

They were left sceptical by architect Ian Gaul’s claims that, according to independent research, building the homes 500mm higher would prevent them being affected.

Among those objecting was Marilyn Webb, who owns a property close to Myreside Farm. She described the revised plans as “misleading”.

“If the land level was to be raised, this would cause any floodwater to run off into adjacent dwellings, causing a significant increase in what is already a known flooding area,” she said.

“As the planning officer similarly stated, the proposal is not considered to be in accordance with the local development plan, plus there are numerous issues that have not been properly addressed.”

Fellow resident and former land manager Douglas Allan shared these concerns and also told the committee that he believed the development would “significantly” affect agricultural business, as the surrounding land is still in use.

Their statements were dismissed by development quality manager Nick Brian. He said: “The key issue that has been raised is the flood risk for the site.

“This has been considered in great detail and given due consideration by the reporter.

“These have been fully discussed with SEPA and flooding officers and they are satisfied that development can go ahead.”

Councillor Callum Gillies, however, asked for the proposals to be deferred and was supported by four other councillors.

He said that he was “very concerned” that the area was not suitable for additional housing.

“I am not convinced this is a safeguard for people who are going to buy into that area and find that, in years to come, they are going to be flooded,” he added.

sgray@thecourier.co.uk