Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Assisted suicide Bill ‘flawed’

Assisted suicide Bill ‘flawed’

Proposals to legalise assisted suicide are flawed and face “major challenges”, a Holyrood committee has said.

The Health Committee said that while the majority of its members did not support the general principles of the Assisted Suicide Bill, it would make no formal recommendation to Parliament on the legislation as it was a matter of conscience.

MSPs have been hearing evidence from individuals and groups for and against the legislation as it makes its way through the Scottish Parliament.

The Bill, which is being championed by Green MSP Patrick Harvie following the death of independent MSP Margo MacDonald, would allow those with terminal or life-shortening illnesses to obtain help in ending their suffering.

A report scrutinising the Bill at stage one said: “The committee believes the Bill contains significant flaws. These present major challenges as to whether the Bill can be progressed.”

Bob Doris MSP, deputy convener of the committee, said: “First of all, the committee wants to acknowledge the positive intentions of Patrick Harvie MSP in bringing this legislation forward.

“Whilst we recognised the complex moral and legal issues that arose during our detailed scrutiny, it was important that we listened, debated and heard the many passionate voices on both sides of the debate.

“The committee has recognised throughout its work that the proposed legislation touches lives in a deeply personal way and we thank those individuals for sharing their personal experience.

“The committee’s intention was to inform the debate and not influence the outcome as that is a matter of conscience for the Parliament when they vote later this month.

“However, the committee agreed that the Bill will need significant amendment should it progress through the parliamentary scrutiny process.”

In response, Mr Harvie said: “This committee report makes no formal recommendation to MSPs, and it’s right that members decide on this issue each having considered it carefully.

“It is, however, disappointing that the committee has placed so little emphasis on the responses I and others have given to the criticisms of the Bill, many of which are grounded in an ideological opposition to personal choice.

“I am hopeful that MSPs will listen to all sides when the Bill reaches the voting stage, and that they will act to end the unnecessary suffering of those who are seeking help to take control at the end of their lives.”

The committee’s report was informed by the written views of more than 800 people and organisations, with oral evidence taken from more than 30 individuals and groups.

Sheila Duffy from My Life, My Death, My Choice, the campaign supporting the Bill, said: “We are content that the Health and Sport Committee has produced a report which seeks to inform the debate and makes no formal recommendation to the Parliament on the Stage 1 vote, leaving the issue up to each MSP to decide for themselves.

“This is only right and proper with an issue subject to a free vote but is a huge step forward from a similar stage of previous attempts at this kind of legislation, reflecting the improvements that have been made.”

The full Parliament will debate the legislation before May 29 and decide whether to agree to its general principles.

The Bill is the second attempt to legislate for assisted suicide at Holyrood, after previous proposals were rejected by MSPs in a free vote in 2010.