Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Pressure on Yes Scotland chief over Herald article ‘deception’

Post Thumbnail

Yes Scotland’s chief executive has been urged to resign after it was revealed the campaign group paid an academic for a newspaper opinion piece published under the banner of an independent charity.

Dr Elliot Bulmer wrote a column for The Herald last month where he branded the “so-called British constitution a mess” before adding “an independent Scotland offers the chance to do things differently.”

No mention was made of Yes Scotland in the article and a brief biography of Dr Bulmer next to it cited his role as a research director of the Constitutional Commission.

However, a Yes spokesman has confirmed “a small fee” was paid for the writing of the piece but insisted they had no influence over its content.

Better Together campaign director Blair McDougall said: “How can we believe what they say if they are secretly paying-off supposedly impartial experts? The leadership of Yes Scotland must take responsibility for this and answer these accusations.”

A Scottish Labour spokesman called payment for the article “a serious breach of faith with the Scottish people.”

He added: “Blair Jenkins has called for the referendum to be an honest debate, yet his organisation appears to be guilty of deep dishonesty and deception. Perhaps one way of ensuring an honest debate would be if Blair Jenkins stepped down and removed himself from it.”

A Yes Scotland spokesman confirmed Dr Bulmer had received a payment.

“We can confirm that in the course of a wide-ranging discussion with Dr Bulmer it was suggested that he, as an academic working in a private capacity, might consider writing an article on matters about constitutional frameworks based on his expertise,” he said.

“At his request, he was paid a nominal fee for the considerable time and effort he spent on it. We had no input to, or any influence over, what he wrote.”

Yes Scotland said police had been called following concerns an email account at the organisation had been “accessed illegally” and that information relating to the matter had been gleaned as a result.

“Given that the illegal breach of Yes Scotland email has become the subject of an extensive and ongoing police inquiry involving detectives from Police Scotland’s Digital Forensics Unit, we have under legal advice and at the request of the investigating officers been unable to discuss the content of the email relating to Dr Bulmer,” the spokesman continued.

“We would now ask that this serious criminal investigation is allowed to continue unhindered by further unhelpful speculation, accusation and misinformation.”

Dr Bulmer said the article was written “in a personal capacity” and there was nothing in the article that would “compromise the Constitutional Commission’s position, nor conflict with its charitable remit.”

He said: “I accepted fair payment for my work as I, as a freelance academic and contributor, have every right to do. I would do the same if anyone else asked for a working day of my time.

“I had full editorial control and was not given any direction on what to say, neither by Yes Scotland nor by my Constitutional Commission colleagues.”

A spokesman for the Constitutional Commission said they had “received no payment”.

A Herald & Times Group spokesman said: “We were offered an article for our opinion pages by a constitutional expert, which we accepted in good faith as a valid contribution to the referendum debate. We declined a request for payment and the author’s background was made clear to our readers.”

The Courier has not seen, nor been in receipt of, any private Yes Scotland correspondence, electronic or otherwise.