Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fife branch of EIS sees ‘little to welcome’ in McCormac Review of teaching

Post Thumbnail

A long-awaited review on teacher employment in Scotland is a ”slap in the face” to teachers and should not be welcomed, according to a union.

The McCormac Review, commissioned by Scottish ministers earlier this year and formally published on Tuesday, made a number of recommendations for key changes to teachers’ working hours and practices, although it seemed to maintain in principle the 35-hour working week and pay structure.

After taking time to digest the review’s findings, Fife branch of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) says the document will do little to boost morale.

A spokesman said: ”We already know that teachers work far longer than 35 hours some research suggests as much as 45 hours per week for classroom teachers and more than 60 hours per week for head teachers and deputes, and the review has guaranteed these sorts of hours will continue.”

The review also suggests concentrating more power in the hands of head teachers, although the EIS fear the handover of power proposed is more than local union members would consider healthy.

”We are well aware of the good work done by many head teachers but the review strikes at the very concept of negotiation in schools,” the spokesman said.

”Indeed the move away from collegiality, whilst of course still cloaking everything in the language of collegiality, will take teachers back in the McCormac time-machine to the early 1990s.”

Fife EIS also believes support in the review for the re-accreditation of teachers is worrying.

The spokesman said: ”There seems to be a myth … that there are large numbers of bad teachers in our schools.

”Fife EIS would reject that view whilst acknowledging that there are issues about competency for a very small number of teachers.

”Coming at a time when the financial imperative for Cosla, and one must assume the Scottish Government, is to get as many teachers off the books as possible for purely financial reasons, ideas about re-accreditation are very worrying indeed.

”The review acknowledges that: ‘OECD data suggests that Scottish teachers spend more time in contact with a class than the majority of nations considered by the OECD.’

”Long hours, ever increasing workload, pay freeze just the time to attack the trust of teachers and the esteem in which they are held. There is little or nothing to welcome here.”