Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Labour accused of ‘ridiculous smears’ in Brian Souter knighthood row

Post Thumbnail

Scottish Labour have been accused of “ridiculous smears” as the row over the knighthood of Stagecoach tycoon Sir Brian Souter continues.

It emerged over the weekend that the Scottish Government nominated Mr Souter for the honour shortly before he donated £500,000 to the SNP.

The administration insists ministers had no role in the process, saying it was overseen by an independent “honours group” of civil servants.

But that was rejected by the Labour Party, who called for an investigation into whether the First Minister’s official spokesman Kevin Pringle may have breached the code of conduct for government advisers.

Mr Pringle had told reporters in June ministers were not involved in the process in “any way, shape, or form.”

Labour leader Iain Gray said, “There is disparity between the First Minister’s spokesman’s original version of events and what has since been confirmed by the Westminster cabinet office and it needs to be investigated.”

SNP MP Angus MacNeil said, “Labour ministers admit they made nominations for honours so they should tell us who they nominated before it’s revealed under freedom of information.

“Second, instead of sending out ridiculous smears, if Labour has evidence that Scottish Government ministers sought a nomination for anyone since 2007 then they should put that evidence in the public domain.”