Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

“Broadcasters are not up to date with the new political realities”

“Broadcasters are not up to date with the new political realities”

The BBC are in serious danger of losing their political credibility in Scotland. After what I would describe as a “patchy at best” reporting of the referendum resulting in protests, boycotts and a general feeling of unfairness in Scotland, their latest stunt has not won them any favours.

But it’s not just them, the other broadcasters are at it too abjectly failing, again, to recognise the new political reality of the UK.

On Monday the network broadcasting organisations announced they are to hold a series of three general election debates that exclude the SNP.

The BBC, ITV, Sky and Channel 4 plan to hold three debates with David Cameron, Ed Miliband, Nick Clegg and Nigel Farage. And the other debates would be head-to-heads.

Now the broadcasters reliably inform us that the announcement follows months of detailed negotiations over the format for debates and reflects “changes in the political landscape”.

As a consequence, most of the political parties have reacted against the proposal with Angus Robertson, the SNP leader at Westminster, branding the broadcasters’ proposal as “utterly unacceptable” and saying the BBC and others had failed in their duty to viewers in Scotland.

The Tories, Lib Dems, SNP, the Green Party and Plaid Cymru have all criticised the proposals, leaving only Ed Miliband appearing relaxed on the matter. Perhaps he is just glad to get the airtime.

The fact is the broadcasters don’t have a leg to stand on by saying that their proposed format factors in “changes in the political landscape” to justify the inclusion of UKIP. They are entirely ignoring the fact that the SNP are now, by far, the third largest political party in the UK.

Even David Cameron raised objections about the Greens not being included. But he contradicted himself by saying that he could not “see how you can have one party in it that has an MP in Parliament and not another party” that also has one MP. Whilst he was rightly referring to the absence of the Greens, he can’t really say that and be happy to exclude parties with several MPs such as the SNP or Plaid Cymru.

And I just don’t get the logic behind the BBC’s obsession with UKIP other than the fact they make a good story due to the gaffes (mostly surrounding issues of racism) and policy yo-yos. As it stands they are a minority party and barely visible in Scotland, much like their Scottish MEP David Cockburn.

Whenever you turn on the BBC you see Farage and friends. This week it was a BBC documentary, The Farage Factor. I can’t remember the last time the BBC did a documentary on a current party leader, never mind one not even remotely close to becoming leader of a government.

You see, the main problem with the broadcasters, and in particular, the BBC’s position on these debates, is that they previously justified the exclusion of the other parties, including the SNP, on the premise that the debates should only include whoever is a candidate for Prime Minister.

Given Nigel Farage is not a candidate the network broadcasters have no basis to exclude parties such as the SNP which have a far greater foothold in politics than UKIP.

In the Swedish election earlier this month, a country renowned for its fairness and equality, the televised debates featured all eight of its party leaders aired on Swedish Television, the public service broadcaster.

I see absolutely no reason why the BBC can’t do the same thing. Not to mention it would make great TV.

In the last Canadian election televised debates of 2011 they included Bloc Qubcois leader Gilles Duceppe. So while the Bloc Qubcois, like the SNP, was not fielding candidates across the whole the country it was included as it is a large mainstream party with substantial political representation.

Scotland is poorly served by the establishment, whether that’s at Westminster or organisations such as the BBC.

Excluding a Scottish voice from UK debate, particularly when the SNP may hold the balance of power next year in Westminster is a mistake. I don’t buy into the conspiracy theories that it is deliberate, I think it is just ignorance about Scottish politics and the balance (or imbalance) of power across the UK.

As a party that is regularly polling above the Lib Dems and excluded from the debates also, Green MP Caroline Lucas said: “broadcasters are not up to date with new political realities”.

And broadcasters shouldn’t squeeze out parties because it is inconvenient.

It’s not too late for the BBC to right the wrong on the matter. As the public service broadcaster they should be leading the way to represent our political times and reflect the new reality of our democracy and you never know, it may help them win back some trust in Scotland too.