Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Delayed Perth and Kinross Council investigation criticised

Delayed Perth and Kinross Council investigation criticised

A Conservative MSP says it is “extraordinary” that Perth and Kinross Council could insist an accusation that staff members were part of a money-making scam was “totally unfounded” then, a month later, confirm they had been suspended.

Mid Scotland and Fife MSP Murdo Fraser has hit out at the local authority for making no attempt to investigate serious allegations when they were first brought to their attention.

The Courier contacted the council on February 10 about building warrants officers allegedly both drawing up and approving building warrants.

The council was asked if any investigations were being carried out.

A week later a response read, “The claims are totally unfounded and no investigation is being carried out regarding the work of building standards.”

On March 31, The Courier put it to the council that staff were being investigated in relation to this matter.

At this point a spokesman admitted, “We can confirm that Perth and Kinross Council has suspended three building standards employees following allegations about their conduct.

“While we cannot comment further on the detail of the ongoing investigation at this time, the allegations are being taken very seriously.”

They added, “However, we would stress at this point none of the allegations against the suspended officers have been substantiated.

“The purpose of the investigation is to establish whether or not there is any substance to them.”

The council has acknowledged that the original Courier inquiry did not spark any investigation, although it is not clear what they did to make sure that the claims were “totally unfounded.”

In fact, it is now the council’s position that they “will investigate any allegations made directly to it, but will not launch investigations solely based on anonymous comments made to newspapers.”

The spokesman said, “Allegations were first made to the council on March 5, and after initial inquiries a formal investigation started on March 10.”

However, Mr Fraser believes that this is not good enough and questioned what other allegations that have been put before the council will have “slipped through the net.”

He said, “It is extraordinary that Perth and Kinross Council dismissed allegations made about employees as ‘unfounded’ back in February when the selfsame complaints then led to the suspension of three staff members a month later.

“It is clear that the council made no attempt to investigate the initial complaint made despite its serious nature.

“The council must realise that any allegations made must be fully investigated and all work by the council has to be transparent and open at all times.”Scam preventionHe added, “The council must make sure that they have procedures in place so that any possible scams are spotted quickly and that they take any allegations seriously.

“Taxpayers in Perth and Kinross will now be wondering how often these mistakes are made by the council. What else is slipping through the net?”

The Courier was told by an insider that the staff two from Blairgowrie, one from Perth are being investigated after a problem on a Blairgowrie build with plans allegedly drawn up and approved by the same person.

He said, “This has been going on for years but the council had to take action following a complaint by a member of the public over their plans.”

He said the council is investigating whether staff had profited by approving warrant applications which they had submitted themselves and for which they had drawn up the plans.

The source who spoke on the guarantee of anonymity said, “Warrant control officers are not supposed to do drawings. They’re certainly not supposed to do drawings and then submit a building warrant application and make the decision on that themselves.

“What they should do if someone comes in looking for a building warrant is direct them to get an architect or architectural technician to do the drawings and submit the application on their behalf or they can submit it themselves.

“It is alleged officers have been saying they don’t need to do that and handling it themselves from their privileged position of being able to fast-track and approve their own work.

“Whether they are doing it on their own or with a colleague in a nice, cosy agreement, it’s equally wrong.”

It is understood the projects involved are mainly small renovations and alterations. The inquiry is in-house, with no police involvement.

It was also suggested that people who gained their warrants in this manner could suffer from a lack of professional indemnity insurance and buildings could even be unsafe.