Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

St Johnstone boss hits out at TV influence

St Johnstone manager Steve Lomas.
St Johnstone manager Steve Lomas.

Frazer Wright has rejected a two-match ban after a weekend clash with Celtic defender Mikael Lustig and will instead plead his case at Hampden.

The St Johnstone defender is adamant that he is innocent of a charge of violent conduct levelled against him by a judicial panel and has been backed by the Perth club.

Had he accepted the suspension he would have automatically been ruled out of Sunday’s crucial clash with Motherwell.

Boss Steve Lomas fears the authorities are in danger of being lured into trial by television, and believes too much power effectively now rests with football programme production staff.

He said: “I’ve looked at the incident several times and I don’t see how they can say Frazer is guilty of violent conduct.

“He’s jumping for the ball and anyone who has ever played football at any level will tell you that you can’t do that with your arms at your sides.

“You put your arms out for leverage. It is a natural body shape. That’s what he has done and unfortunately Frazer has caught the Celtic player. But there’s nothing violent about it.

“If Frazer had been looking at him when he did it I’d be the first to say it’s not right and that it’s dangerous. But football is a contact sport and sometimes these collisions simply happen by accident.”

Lomas expressed concern that television is playing too big a role in the disciplinary process and he believes he has the backing of fellow managers.”

“This shows up the whole system because the referee and his assistants saw nothing wrong with it at the time,” said Lomas.

“What has happened is that an editor in the BBC has decided that’s the incident they’re going to highlight this week and that’s that. I know other managers have had a problem with this as well.

“The system seems to centre around whatever appears on Sportscene. So who is making these decisions? Is it the Sportscene editor?

“I have seen loads of incidents this season that could have been called up but weren’t because they didn’t appear on the telly on a Sunday night. You only seem to get done if they highlight it.

“I’d like to know how they decide these things. Does someone go through all the games in the SPL or do they just have a quick look at the highlights on the telly and make up their list of who to do from there?

“We had a situation earlier in the season where we couldn’t appeal a red card because there was no telly evidence to back our player’s case.

“The TV missed it so our player had to accept a ban. Now we’re being done because of the television. I think this is a dangerous road to go down. It’s about consistency.”